Online discussion response q 2
        This topic is confusing to me. Is not the IEP a legal document intended to promote accountability? We write goals with the initial expectation that they are attainable by the student. The IEP team members form a consensus and agree to the appropriateness of the proposed goals. The progress being made towards the IEP goals is reported to the parents with the same frequency as general education students. Is this not accountability to the same degree as general education?
        The question concerning using standardized testing with students with disabilities and should they be included is equally confusing. Students with special needs are administered many standardized tests over the course of the educational careers. Last time I looked the Woodcock-Johnson is standardized and so is the Brigance, just to name a couple. Students with special needs are also administered the CAPA exam annually (although I think its acronym has changed to something else). Our regular education students are given the state standardized test to measure their apparent progress to other students in the state as well as nationally. This is also the purpose of the CAPA test.
        Perhaps I am misinterpreting the question but I believe that students with special needs do participate in standardized testing. Should they be forced to take a regular test that is obviously beyond their abilities? Why not? Provided they are given the appropriate accommodations to showcase their learning. What better validation for a teacher than to actually see our students succeeding academically.
        This topic is confusing to me. Is not the IEP a legal document intended to promote accountability? We write goals with the initial expectation that they are attainable by the student. The IEP team members form a consensus and agree to the appropriateness of the proposed goals. The progress being made towards the IEP goals is reported to the parents with the same frequency as general education students. Is this not accountability to the same degree as general education?
        The question concerning using standardized testing with students with disabilities and should they be included is equally confusing. Students with special needs are administered many standardized tests over the course of the educational careers. Last time I looked the Woodcock-Johnson is standardized and so is the Brigance, just to name a couple. Students with special needs are also administered the CAPA exam annually (although I think its acronym has changed to something else). Our regular education students are given the state standardized test to measure their apparent progress to other students in the state as well as nationally. This is also the purpose of the CAPA test.
        Perhaps I am misinterpreting the question but I believe that students with special needs do participate in standardized testing. Should they be forced to take a regular test that is obviously beyond their abilities? Why not? Provided they are given the appropriate accommodations to showcase their learning. What better validation for a teacher than to actually see our students succeeding academically.
